Obviously that is a good reason why not to support a movie. I don't disagree there, and nor am I saying that in any part of this blog to go support it. I just want you to see somethings that I see in Phillip Pullman. Milton's "Paradise Lost" was a very influential piece in Pullman's life. Even so that he reflects some of Milton's religious views. He also shared views with Jean-Jacques Rosseau. Sme of these views consisted of mans moral ability to be good, not only good but to be born good. This would conflict with main-stream Christianity in the views on original sin. Pullman is an atheist. He doesn't believe in God or a god.
To me, this doesn't make sense. 1) Do atheists not believe in God, or do they just not acknowledge him? 2) Why does Pullman write a book and at the end try to kill something that doesn't exist to him?
1)The reason why i wonder if Atheists just don't acknowledge that there is a God rather than not believing in him is because of Scripture. A lot of people do not believe in the Bible and its reliability to you is of no value, but for those who hold the Bible as the inerrant and infallible Word of God then this is for you. Romans 1:18-21 says,
"For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who by their unrighteousness suppress the truth. For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them. For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse. For although they knew God, they did not honor him as God or give thanks to him, but they became futile in their thinking, and their foolish hearts were darkened."
It says that they suppress the truth. They know God but choose not to give him glory. Their hearts were hardened. 2)Pullman does not believe in God or a god, yet writes a book and in the last book of the series he tries to kill God. So, he sets up his books and works to write about something that does not exist to him and then kills him.....why? That makes no sense at all! Other authors would argue the same thing. They would say he gives more credit to God than he realizes.